Do I Feel 68?

At 68, life feels both long and fleeting. A reflection on memory, time, age, and the mystery of what growing older means.

The numbers that mark our passage through life are precise on paper, yet inwardly they seldom settle into anything exact.

Arun Kumar

A couple of weeks ago, I turned 68. Sometime during that day, J. asked, “Do I feel 68?”

Perhaps what J. meant was not whether I felt 68 in any literal sense. The numbers that mark our passage through life are precise on paper, yet inwardly they seldom settle into anything exact. They accumulate quietly, like rings in a tree, recording time without telling us what it should feel like to stand within it. Or perhaps it was only a rhetorical question, one of those small remarks that drift into the day and leave behind an unexpectedly large echo.

The question made me look back over the 68-year arc of my life — where it began, and where it has brought me now. In one sense, it feels like a very long journey, stretching from my boyhood, through my years at Indian Institute of Technology, then onward to America and all that followed after. In another sense, it feels as though the days, months, and years have slipped past with astonishing haste, as if time, after lingering in childhood, eventually learned how to run.

Living through time can feel like walking through a hall of mirrors. Events recede, enlarge, bend out of proportion, or return unexpectedly from strange angles. What once seemed immense may now appear small and insignificant; what felt ordinary at the time may glow in memory with a significance it never announced when it first occurred. The relationship between memory and time is rarely faithful. It is impressionistic, almost dreamlike, preserving sentiment more readily than sequence.

There is still a remembrance of moving through that timeline, but the specifics have faded. The individual days of my thirteenth year on earth, no longer possess enough sharpness to be distinguished from one another. They survive not as dates, but blurred visions.

With time, memory itself becomes a blurred spectrum. What remains are recollections without timestamps: the school I attended, the evenings spent playing in the park across from our house where children my age gathered, the shy ache of a crush on someone I never quite found the courage to speak to, the bicycle rides to the vegetable market. If I reach inward, I can still draw these scenes from their slumber, though they guard their secret well and refuse to tell me the exact year or day to which they belonged.

My mind still carries these small fragments without attaching them to any particular moment in time. Perhaps that is because they were woven into the ordinary fabric of life, part of a rhythm that extended across those years between twelve and seventeen years of age. Routine, while we are living inside it, often feels unremarkable; only later do we understand that it was quietly building the emotional landscape of a life.

And yet there are certain days that remain sharply individualized in memory. September 11 is one of them. I remember the beauty of the day — the clear blue sky, the slight chill in the air hinting that winter was not too far away — the drive back in the green pickup to collect our son from school, and then the hours at home in front of the television, watching the events unfold and trying, like everyone else, to make sense of what could not yet be understood.

In general, though, stretches of time do not possess the same firmness as distances in space. A road can be measured; a year back in the past is not held with the same certainty.

By some strange distortion of time, my earlier life now feels immeasurably distant, as though it belongs not merely to another era, but almost to another self.

So now I am 68. A lifetime has already passed behind me, and I am retired now, living with a clearer awareness of mortality than I once did. At this stage, one no longer takes for granted that time will continue to unfold indefinitely.

In two years, I will be 70, and I am certain someone will ask again, perhaps half in jest and half in wonder, what it feels like to be 70. I am equally certain that I will not have a satisfactory answer then either.

And if, in the community clubhouse, I were to meet someone older than myself, I might ask in return, “Do you feel 90 now?” I would not expect an answer. There is no handbook that tells us what one is supposed to feel at 90, or 70, or 68. The question is less about information. We ask it because age is visible from the outside, but never fully knowable from within.

Answer or no answer, I am glad to be here. I am glad to be 68. I look forward to the pleasures that remain — playing pickleball, and now and then finding myself on a river cruise, watching towns drift past as time continues its patient onward march, carrying me toward 70. For now, that is enough. All I can hope is that I will still be here to hear the question--Do you feel 70?

Ciao, and thanks for reading.

 

The Vortex of Happenings

A candle burns.
Time slips.
You and I
caught in the vortex of happenings
—oblivious to death.

 

The Weight of Leisure

Retirement brings time affluence, but it also brings a vivid view of the horizon. How do we learn to live purely for now?

If time is running out, how can you justify spending the remaining currency on something that leaves absolutely no footprint behind?

Arun Kumar

How do we bring ourselves to engage in an activity fully for its own sake when confronted by an enhanced awareness of mortality? For me, this question began as a shimmering, smoky pattern — an ambient background noise that only slowly took shape after the structure of retirement set in.

In the workforce, time was an external currency. It was budgeted, traded, and justified by outcomes — a paycheck, a project completed, an objective achieved. Over decades, I was conditioned to live a strictly goal-directed existence, where the value of the present moment was always borrowed from the future milestone it served. Then, the career ended. The calendar cleared. I entered a state of time affluence, handed a blank check of hours to spend exactly as I please.

It should have been a dream come true.

But this sudden abundance arrived with a dark companion: a heightened view of the horizon, and a stark awareness of the limited time that remains.

And here is where a paradox of retirement bites: a sudden affluence of time, vast enough to support any pursuit, colliding with the narrowing corridor of a finite life. I am finally free to choose activities entirely for their own sake, yet the gravity of finitude raises awkward questions when I engage in them.

How do I summon the devotion to play, to create, to simply be — while knowing the act is entirely self-contained? How do I throw myself fully into an activity when the effort is not for a monument, but a moment? How do we justify the expenditure of energy when it is not preserved in a repository of achievements, carved into a legacy, or used to build a bridge to some future destination?

You would think that knowing time is limited would make us savor the pure, unadulterated “now” — to paint, to read, to play, to walk, purely for the joy of it. Instead, the awareness of mortality twists the autelic activities into unsettling questions that arrive unbidden, crashing into the very middle of doing. A persistent whisper demands to know the ultimate point of an arbitrary pursuit. If time is running out, how can I justify spending its remaining currency on something that will leave no footprint behind?

For now, I do not have answers. I know this interior monologue will go on. It will often feel tedious, spinning in exhausting circles without offering the grace of immediate closure or a neat solution.

But there is also a quiet necessity in keeping this introspection alive. By refusing to look away from the friction, I hope to slowly inch closer to a deeper grounding — a way to inhabit activities purely for the sake of the doing, and perhaps, lengthen the beautiful, tranquil spaces between the echoes of autelic anxiety.

Ciao, and thanks for reading.

 

Acceptance: Finding Joy in a Universe That Says “You Just Are”

When the hunger for a "Why" meets a silent universe, the answer isn't more searching—it's the courage to embrace life as it actually is.

It is startling to realize that I am essentially searching for a signal in a world that is an end product of noise.

Arun Kumar

 

The Beginning

A part of me is defined by a singular, persistent ache: the hunger for understanding the “Why” of my existence while living in a universe that only offers “You Just Are.” My efforts to reconcile these two opposites—the seeking of a reason and the indifference of reality—act as a perpetual fuel for introspection. Their tension is an invitation to the sense of the Absurd. It is startling to realize that I am essentially searching for a signal in a world that is an end product of noise.

The Quiet Air

The feeling of absurdity is not a constant weight on my shoulder, however; rather, it is as variable and unpredictable as the weather. There are days when the air is quiet, and so is the feeling of the Absurd. On days like those, I move through my routines with a sense of ease. The “Why” of existence stays at bay. The joy of doing has an unquestioned and unexamined presence; it requires no justification. While watching a movie, I do not question whether I should be doing something “more meaningful” instead. I do not risk losing the pleasure of the moment to the shadows of doubt.

The Storm

But then, without warning, the wind shifts. The winds of the Absurd begin to howl. They are not unlike the Santa Ana of California, dry and searing, or the Viento del Sur as it crests the Cantabrian Mountains of Spain, tumbling down the slopes with a pressure that agitates the soul. When these winds blow full force, they strip away the veneer of my unquestioned engagement with daily routine. Quite suddenly, everything becomes a question; everything needs to be turned over and examined. And with that, the sense of coherence bids adieu.

The Danger of Exposure

If I leave myself exposed to these winds for too long, the consequences are more than just philosophical dabbling into existence and its meaning; they become visceral. Prolonged exposure to the Absurd manifests as disengagement and a sense of lethargy. If nothing matters on a cosmic scale, the simple act of cleaning the kitchen sink or bringing oneself to answer an email begins to feel like moving through molasses. Without a protective framework against the Absurd, the sense of motivation withers.

I Am Not Alone

Cinema has long attempted to capture this internal landscape. A striking cinematic portrait of this struggle is found in The Bridge on the River Kwai. The protagonist, Colonel Nicholson, is a man who refuses to inhabit a world that “Just Is.” Held in the senseless vacuum of a prisoner-of-war camp, he seeks shelter from the winds of absurdity by anchoring himself to a singular purpose: the construction of a magnificent bridge.

To Nicholson, the bridge is more than wood and stone; it is his “Why.” It represents discipline, craftsmanship, and a defiant order against the chaos of the jungle. He becomes so insulated within this constructed meaning that he loses sight of the broader reality—that he is building a vital instrument for his enemy. The climax arrives when the “glass house” of his obsession finally shatters. In a moment of jarring clarity, he surveys the destruction and realizes the utter senselessness of his labor. His final words—“Madness... madness!”—serve as a haunting realization of the Absurd. He recognizes, too late, that his signal of “meaning” was merely another piece in the noise of war.

Seeking Shelter

For millennia, religion has served as our primary storm cellar. It offers a sturdy roof of continuity, promising that our narrative does not end at the grave and imbuing our moral choices with eternal weight. That shelter, however, does not work for everyone or for me.

Are there other ways? Perhaps. One of them is the path of radical acceptance: the suggestion that if my life does not have a pre-ordained meaning or purpose, that is okay.

The Acceptance

If I stop the quest for answers to my “Why,” the struggle ends. The winds subside. To conceptualize this, consider the game of table tennis that I play. There is no cosmic significance to a plastic ball moving across a net. Yet, in the rhythmic click-clack, the focus of the eye, and the kinetic joy of the movement, the search for the “Why” of me becomes irrelevant for a few hours.

If I can internalize this on a larger scale, the harsh winds of the Absurd will lose their bite. In that acceptance, I can find a quiet, resilient serenity. The goal is to move toward an acceptance that becomes part of my marrow. From that vantage point, the existential gusts are no longer a threat; I may occasionally sway, but I will remain anchored. And so, I can pray:

Universe, grant me the serenity to accept the state of my absurdity that I cannot change, courage to find joy in the mundane, and wisdom to know the difference.

I live in the hope that the acceptance of “You Just Are” will keep the harsh winds of absurdity at bay.

Ciao, and thanks for reading.